Medically assisted deaths that are requested by terminally ill patients is a kind of mercy killing or commonly called as euthanasia. For many cultures, this is ethically unacceptable. Spiritual and religious beliefs that are dominant in a certain society will certainly disallow the legalization of this action. In other parts of the world, however, this has been legalized. In the US, the states Vermont, Washington, and Oregon, have made this legal.
For many religious groups and humane societies, they strongly oppose this type of killing. They strongly believe that death is not in the hands of man. It is a natural cause or occurrence that cannot be administered by any human being. These assisted suicide states require that the terminally ill patient requests the act to be acted upon him or her.
Another requirement is that the patient needs to be in his or her stable state of mind upon the request and that two doctors have diagnosed the same terminal illness and that he or she has no more than six months remaining to live. There should also be two witnesses present during the time assisted suicide was requested. Finally, the patient is allowed to change his or her mind within fifteen days. If the request remains to be certain, then the doctor can proceed.
This topic has been spurred once again because of the Brittany Maynard, who requested to be euthanized because she wanted to end her suffering from brain cancer. She died in two thousand four when her request was granted. She was one of the advocates of assisted death. Some states are now passing bills regarding the legalization of such act.
Since then, there are already bills being passed on with regards to its legalization. Maynard was still so young. She was pretty, educated, and had a happy disposition. When she knew she barely had the chance at the disease, she decided to move to Oregon, where the act was legal.
It was believed that the case of Murphy has spurred lawmakers to create legislations that will legalize the matter. Murphy made her final decision in November of twenty fourteen. It was very controversial and many thought it was unethical for doctors to actually approve it.
She was wise enough to move to Oregon where physician assisted suicide has been legally approved. But still, it was a very controversial case. Different groups have varying opinions. Politicians and lawmakers, consequently, are caught in the middle.
Maynard has created a great impact, both negative and positive to the society. The bills passed on are yet to be approved and as always, there are two sides of the coin. Perspectives regarding the issue are divided and everyone has the right to express how they feel about the issue. Among the different realms affected, the political realm is most pressured.
Legislators are now having a dilemma whether or not the bills are to be approved or not. The issue is still so fresh and the two sides of the coin have become demanding. The subject is stressful and there are so many cultures and societies that might follow the path of America if they decide to finally legalize this in most, if not all, states and regions.
For many religious groups and humane societies, they strongly oppose this type of killing. They strongly believe that death is not in the hands of man. It is a natural cause or occurrence that cannot be administered by any human being. These assisted suicide states require that the terminally ill patient requests the act to be acted upon him or her.
Another requirement is that the patient needs to be in his or her stable state of mind upon the request and that two doctors have diagnosed the same terminal illness and that he or she has no more than six months remaining to live. There should also be two witnesses present during the time assisted suicide was requested. Finally, the patient is allowed to change his or her mind within fifteen days. If the request remains to be certain, then the doctor can proceed.
This topic has been spurred once again because of the Brittany Maynard, who requested to be euthanized because she wanted to end her suffering from brain cancer. She died in two thousand four when her request was granted. She was one of the advocates of assisted death. Some states are now passing bills regarding the legalization of such act.
Since then, there are already bills being passed on with regards to its legalization. Maynard was still so young. She was pretty, educated, and had a happy disposition. When she knew she barely had the chance at the disease, she decided to move to Oregon, where the act was legal.
It was believed that the case of Murphy has spurred lawmakers to create legislations that will legalize the matter. Murphy made her final decision in November of twenty fourteen. It was very controversial and many thought it was unethical for doctors to actually approve it.
She was wise enough to move to Oregon where physician assisted suicide has been legally approved. But still, it was a very controversial case. Different groups have varying opinions. Politicians and lawmakers, consequently, are caught in the middle.
Maynard has created a great impact, both negative and positive to the society. The bills passed on are yet to be approved and as always, there are two sides of the coin. Perspectives regarding the issue are divided and everyone has the right to express how they feel about the issue. Among the different realms affected, the political realm is most pressured.
Legislators are now having a dilemma whether or not the bills are to be approved or not. The issue is still so fresh and the two sides of the coin have become demanding. The subject is stressful and there are so many cultures and societies that might follow the path of America if they decide to finally legalize this in most, if not all, states and regions.
About the Author:
You can visit fenregistration.org for more helpful information about The Debate On Assisted Suicide States.
No comments:
Post a Comment